A new curriculum is going to be introduced at the secondary
level in January of next year where students will no longer have any divisions
like science, business studies or humanities after enrolling in class nine. All
students will have to study 10 common compulsory subjects.
In the existing system, students in secondary level are to
sit for exams for at least 400 marks on stream-based subjects. Students are
allowed to choose elective subjects
besides compulsory ones as per their streams.
But In the new curriculum, all the subjects of the science
stream will be merged to 100 marks and will be taught as ‘Science’. A large
portion of educationists, experts, and parents raise concern about the new
curriculum terming it as ‘unilateral' instead of specialized. They say,
specialized education like science has become insignificant in this new
curriculum. It is said that the new curriculum aims at making students science-oriented,but
the prospect of failure is looming large. Students will have less time if all
are taught combindly. Particularly interest may decline in science education
among students, remark the concerned.
In the country’s history, this is the first time authority
moves on to remove the stream-based specialization of science, business
studies, and humanities from the secondary-level. Even in 1990, the students of
the science stream in the secondary level had to sit for 1000 marks on 11
subjects in the public exam. The total marks for the science stream was 300,
which was 30 percent of the full marks. In 2000, there were a total of 11
subjects for 1100 marks having 400 marks for science which is 36 percent of the
total marks. In 2017, there were 1300 marks for 14 subjects where 400 marks, or
31 percent of the total marks were allocated for science subjects. But In the
latest curriculum, a total of 1000 marks in 10 subjects designed for class
IX-X. Science has 100 marks which is only 10 percent of the total marks in the
secondary examination.
According to latest curriculum, there will be a total of 10
subjects from grades six to ten. These are Bengali, English, Mathematics,
Science, History and Social Sciences, Digital Technology, Life and Livelihood,
Health Safety, Religious studies, Art and Culture. According to the new
curriculum Secondary School Certificate (SSC) Exams would be based on class X syllabus only
though the exam was held based on class IX and X previously.
A large portion of educationist fear that the number of
science students at the higher secondary level will decrease further if the new
curriculum is implemented. They argue science students have been studying
physics, chemistry, biology, and higher mathematics separately to large extent
for a long time in class IX-X. The higher the level students go after secondary
school, the lower the rate of students visible in science. In this situation,
if the scope of science education becomes narrow at the secondary level, the
number of science students will decrease further.
Majority concerned with the education sector wonder that if
the new curriculum is implemented, the number of science students at the higher
level will decrease further. They argue science students have been studying
physics, chemistry, biology, and higher mathematics separately for a long time
in class IX-XI. This was comparatively on a larger scale. The higher the level
after secondary school, the lower the participation rate of students visible in
science. In this context, if the scope of science education becomes narrow at
the secondary level, the number of science students may decrease further.
According to the latest report of Bangladesh Bureau of
Education Information and Statistics (BANBEIS), the percentage of science
candidates in SSC exam from 2018 to 2022 was 31 percent, 31.94 percent, 30.92
percent, 28.19 percent and 31.93 percent respectively. This rate has declined
further at higher secondary level. From 2018 to 2022, the percentage of
candidates from science stream in higher secondary exam was 22.29 percent,
23.35 percent, 23.42 percent, 22.50 percent and 24.54 percent respectively. The
percentage of undergraduate students who attended in science-based subjects in
the final exam in 2018 and 2029 was 17.48 percent and 16.06 percent. In 2020,
the rate stands at 23.28 percent.
However, Education Ministry officials admitted that the data
of the year 2020 is incomplete because
it was not possible to compile the complete data due to the Covid-19. But there
is speculation that the rate will come down once it’s available. Besides, the
complete data of 2021 and 2022 has not yet been published to date.
The statement of National Curriculum and Textbook Board
(NCTB) in this regard reads, ‘In this curriculum, the subject 'Science' in class
9 and 10 comprises proportion and quantity, system, structure and behavior of
living and non-living things in the system, structure and characterstics of
matter, interactions between matter and energy, state and change also texts
from biology, and earth and space sciences. Students will be taught these
subjects in such a way that they can acquire scientific literacy, grow interest
in scientific inquiry and develop scientific skills and attitudes among them.'
Although, there is doubt among the teachers whether the
purpose of the new curriculum will be fulfilled. On the condition of anonymity,
a teacher of chemistry department at a college in Barishal said, "Earlier,
the students who were interested in science, used to choose science and they
had to study science-based subjects with special emphasis. Because of this,
they could spend more time on these subjects and get a chance to learn
everything well. But now they have to read about everything, they won’t be able
to give enough time for sciences. It’s true that studying science-based
subjects requires relatively more time. Consequently, when the time will be
reduced here or additional pressure of other subjects has to be endured, the
learning and memorization of students in this stream will also decrease a lot
compared to before.
He also said, `Besides, not everyone feels interest in
studying mathematics and physics. When we pressurise them there is confusion
about how much they are learning. Considering these, removing stream boundary
in the new curriculum can create more complexities.’
Meanwhile, comparing with the education system of the
technology-based countries of the world, it is found that students in several
countries have the opportunity to choose the subjects of their choice at the
secondary level and physics, chemistry, and mathematics are taught separately
instead of integrated science education. Education system of China requires
completion of junior secondary school between the ages of 12 and 15. Students
are taught the basic subjects of science like mathematics and physics
relatively in detailed. Similarly, In the education system of England,
secondary level students can study the subjects of their choice and can choose
any subject related to science, arts or social science according to their choice.
Dhaka University physics professor Kamrul Hasan Mamun said,
"There are many divisions of education in our country -madrasha education,
general education and English medium education. These divisions are creating
inequality in the society. The poorest child goes to Qawmi and the richest
child to English medium. We urged to remove this discrimination. But the
government has instead given away the division of science, humanities,
commerce, which has further threatened our education. As a result of this education
system, we will no longer get doctors, engineers or brilliant science
researchers. While everyone is learning everything, it seems no one is learning
anything properly. Because of this limitation of education at the secondary
level, they will not be interested in science education at the higher level.”
He also said, 'There are many famous doctors, engineers and
scientists in England. Their educational system is proven successful. Their
education system is also exits in our country. If we want to catch up with the
developed world, why are we going to experiment so much on students without
taking that curriculum?'
NCTB member (Academic) Prof. Mashiuzzaman too admitted the
limitation of new curricula. He said The Bonik Barta, "There will be some
learning deficit in the new curricula, but we will be able to fulfill it in
higher secondary. We are doing this so that students learn humanity, values,
history and culture of the country well till secondary school. They will study
following their choice in higher secondary level. Now they are giving 35
percent time for science at higher secondary level. It will be 75 percent in
the upcoming system. How many scientists have we been able to create by
dividing the separate stream in the secondary level? Interest in science will
not decrease in this new curriculum. Rather, the lack of idea among some
students about science can be overcome.”
Translated by Mehedi Mamun